At its core, the BOGO offer leverages a powerful psychological trigger: the "zero price effect." Behavioral economists have long noted that people will often overvalue an item simply because it is free, sometimes choosing a free mediocre product over a high-quality product at a steep discount. In the context of running shoes—which can easily range from $120 to $250—the promise of a second pair at no cost creates a sense of urgent "found money." For the runner, it feels like a rare opportunity to bypass the high cost of entry for a sport that, ironically, is often marketed as "free." Retail Strategy: Clearing the Path
Retailers rarely offer BOGO deals on the newest flagship models. Instead, these promotions are strategic tools for inventory lifecycle management. Running shoe technology moves at a blistering pace; brands like Nike, Brooks, and Saucony typically release updated versions of their popular silhouettes every 12 months.
By securing two pairs at once, a runner can engage in "shoe rotation." This is the practice of alternating between two different pairs of shoes to allow the foam midsoles time to fully decompress between runs. Studies suggest that rotating shoes can reduce the risk of overuse injuries by providing slightly different mechanical stresses on the body. In this light, a BOGO deal isn't just saving money; it’s an investment in injury prevention. The Hidden Caveats
However, the "Buy One, Get One" lure requires a discerning eye. Often, these deals are "BOGO 50% Off" rather than "BOGO Free," which is a significantly different value proposition. Furthermore, runners must ensure that the shoes being offered actually fit their biomechanical needs. A free pair of stability shoes is a liability, not a benefit, to a runner who requires a neutral cushion. The "deal" quickly vanishes if the second pair leads to plantar fasciitis or stress fractures because it was selected for its price tag rather than its performance. Conclusion
For the consumer, a BOGO deal on running shoes is more than just a bargain; it is a functional necessity. Running shoes have a finite lifespan, typically measured in miles (usually 300 to 500). A dedicated runner training for a marathon might easily cover 30 to 50 miles a week, meaning they will burn through a pair of shoes in just three months.
Buy One Get One Running — Shoes
At its core, the BOGO offer leverages a powerful psychological trigger: the "zero price effect." Behavioral economists have long noted that people will often overvalue an item simply because it is free, sometimes choosing a free mediocre product over a high-quality product at a steep discount. In the context of running shoes—which can easily range from $120 to $250—the promise of a second pair at no cost creates a sense of urgent "found money." For the runner, it feels like a rare opportunity to bypass the high cost of entry for a sport that, ironically, is often marketed as "free." Retail Strategy: Clearing the Path
Retailers rarely offer BOGO deals on the newest flagship models. Instead, these promotions are strategic tools for inventory lifecycle management. Running shoe technology moves at a blistering pace; brands like Nike, Brooks, and Saucony typically release updated versions of their popular silhouettes every 12 months. buy one get one running shoes
By securing two pairs at once, a runner can engage in "shoe rotation." This is the practice of alternating between two different pairs of shoes to allow the foam midsoles time to fully decompress between runs. Studies suggest that rotating shoes can reduce the risk of overuse injuries by providing slightly different mechanical stresses on the body. In this light, a BOGO deal isn't just saving money; it’s an investment in injury prevention. The Hidden Caveats At its core, the BOGO offer leverages a
However, the "Buy One, Get One" lure requires a discerning eye. Often, these deals are "BOGO 50% Off" rather than "BOGO Free," which is a significantly different value proposition. Furthermore, runners must ensure that the shoes being offered actually fit their biomechanical needs. A free pair of stability shoes is a liability, not a benefit, to a runner who requires a neutral cushion. The "deal" quickly vanishes if the second pair leads to plantar fasciitis or stress fractures because it was selected for its price tag rather than its performance. Conclusion Running shoe technology moves at a blistering pace;
For the consumer, a BOGO deal on running shoes is more than just a bargain; it is a functional necessity. Running shoes have a finite lifespan, typically measured in miles (usually 300 to 500). A dedicated runner training for a marathon might easily cover 30 to 50 miles a week, meaning they will burn through a pair of shoes in just three months.
This could have to do with the pathing policy as well. The default SATP rule is likely going to be using MRU (most recently used) pathing policy for new devices, which only uses one of the available paths. Ideally they would be using Round Robin, which has an IOPs limit setting. That setting is 1000 by default I believe (would need to double check that), meaning that it sends 1000 IOPs down path 1, then 1000 IOPs down path 2, etc. That’s why the pathing policy could be at play.
To your question, having one path down is causing this logging to occur. Yes, it’s total possible if that path that went down is using MRU or RR with an IOPs limit of 1000, that when it goes down you’ll hit that 16 second HB timeout before nmp switches over to the next path.